Back to Articles
SEO7 min read
How Image Sizes Affect Your Google Ranking
Learn how image file sizes impact Core Web Vitals, page speed, and Google rankings. Practical tips for compressing images without losing quality.
Learn how image file sizes impact Core Web Vitals, page speed, and Google rankings. Practical tips for compressing images without losing quality.
If you've been chasing higher Google rankings by tweaking meta descriptions and building backlinks, you may be overlooking the single biggest factor holding your site back: unoptimized images.
Google's 2021 Page Experience update made Core Web Vitals an official ranking signal. The metrics that matter:
Images directly influence all three of these metrics. A single unoptimized hero image can push your LCP past 5 seconds—instantly disqualifying your page from Google's "good experience" threshold.
Let's look at the real numbers. A typical blog post with 10 unoptimized images might look like this:
| Image Type | Raw Size | Optimization Potential |
|-----------|----------|----------------------|
| Hero banner (1920×1080) | 1.2 MB JPEG | Can be reduced to 200-300 KB |
| Screenshot | 800 KB PNG | Convert to WebP: 120 KB |
| Icons/UI elements | 2.1 MB total | SVG/WebP: ~50 KB total |
| Product photos (×6) | 4.8 MB total | Compress + convert: 600 KB |
Total page weight before: 8.9 MB → After optimization: ~1 MBThat's a nearly 90% reduction in image-related page weight. The impact on load times is dramatic.
Instead of guessing compression levels, set an exact target. For example, if your CMS limits uploads to 200 KB, you can use a [Free Image Compressor to KB](/tools/compress-image-to-kb) to reduce size precisely to the required limit. This tool processes everything in your browser—completely private, no server uploads.
Legacy formats like JPEG and PNG are wasteful compared to modern alternatives. Converting to WebP with a [PNG to WebP converter](/tools/png-to-webp) cuts size by up to 80% while preserving quality. For JPEG photographs, the savings are equally impressive.
Use srcset to serve different image sizes based on the user's viewport:
<img
src="photo-800.webp"
srcset="photo-400.webp 400w, photo-800.webp 800w, photo-1200.webp 1200w"
sizes="(max-width: 600px) 400px, (max-width: 1200px) 800px, 1200px"
alt="Optimized responsive image"
/>After optimizing your images, you should see:
You can track these improvements using:
1. Over-compression — Going too aggressive on quality creates visual artifacts. Aim for Q70–Q85 on WebP.
2. Ignoring mobile — Mobile users are 2–3× more sensitive to slow load times than desktop users.
3. Not using caching — Even optimized images benefit from CDN caching and proper Cache-Control headers.
4. Skipping preload — Your LCP image should use <link rel="preload"> for the fastest possible paint.
Image optimization is not a one-time task—it's an ongoing part of maintaining a high-performing, SEO-friendly website. Start by auditing your current image library, then systematically compress and convert your assets. Use a [Free Image Compressor to KB](/tools/compress-image-to-kb) to hit exact size targets and a [PNG to WebP converter](/tools/png-to-webp) to modernize your format pipeline. Your rankings—and your users—will thank you.